According to the announcement, what topic will be covered?A.Housing lawsB.Market trendsC.B
According to the announcement, what topic will be covered?
A.Housing laws
B.Market trends
C.Business customs
D.Cultural exchange
According to the announcement, what topic will be covered?
A.Housing laws
B.Market trends
C.Business customs
D.Cultural exchange
第1題
According to the talk, what is the relationship between Amy and Ann?
A.They are colleagues.
B.They are neighbors.
C.They are close friends.
D.They are roommates.
第2題
According to the passage, which is true about Ann Keen?
A.She refused the local airport plan.
B.She took 1,500 pound illegally.
C.She was notorious for extravagance.
D.She was the center of the scandal.
第3題
According to Lee Ann, you cannot train an ordinary dog ______.
A.to put things on people's laps
B.to always interact with its owner
C.to alert deaf people
D.to love working
第4題
According to the interview, what happened since Mary Ann were 100?
A.She had a blimp ride.
B.She had a horse ride.
C.She touched the Hollywood sign.
D.She stayed at home.
第5題
According to the text, which of the following is CORRECT about Ann Keen?
A.She refused the local airport plan.
B.She took 1,500 pound illegally.
C.She was notorious for extravagance.
D.She was the center of the scandal.
第6題
What is true according to the passage.'?
A.Helen was born blind and deaf.
B.A sickness caused her to be blind and deaf.
C.Helen lost her sight and hearing at the age of 19.
第7題
What is true according to the passage?
A.Helen was born blind and deaf.
B.A sickness caused her to be blind and deaf.
C.Helen lost her sight and hearing at the age of 19.
第8題
聽力原文: Helen Keller lost her sight and hearing of a sickness at the age of 19 months, even before she had learned to talk. For the first seven years of her life she was like a wild animal. She wanted other people to communicate. Finally her parents sent for a teacher, Miss Ann Sullivan Ann taught her how to learn about the world through touch and smell and feeling, and eventually she became a teacher, a writer and lecturer.
What is true according to the passage?
A.Helen was born blind and deaf.
B.A sickness caused her to be blind and deaf.
C.Helen lost her sight and heating at the age of 19.
第9題
聽力原文: Welcome to Physiology 100. I'm Doctor Ann Roberts. I assume everyone here is a sophomore, since this is the Nursing Department second-year physiology course. If you are first-year nursing students, please see me after class about transferring into introductory course. OK, I'd like to begin my first lecture by introducing two important terms, vitalism versus mechanism. How many of you have heard of these terms? Oh, I see sorae of you have. Well, vitalism and mechanism are two completely opposite approaches to human physiology. According to the vitalist, the laws of physics and chemistry alone can not explain the processes of life. To the vitalist, there is a so-called vital force, and this vital force is totally separate from that of energy. As you may have guessed, vitalism is a kind of philosophical approach. Mechanism, on the other hand, is the view that all life phenomena, no matter how complex, can be explained according to chemical and physical laws. Since we can support mechanism through scientific experimentation, the modern scientist tends to be a mechanist. But vitalism is not totally dismissed, especially in fields such as brain physiology, where terms such as human consciousness haven't been defined yet in physic-chemical terms. I recently read an interesting article that dealt with this very question. Is the mind separate from brain, or is the mind only the chemical and physiological workings of the brain.'? I'd like to continue with this next time, so that we can speak in more detail. I have some copies of that article. And I want you to take it with you and read it for next week.
For whom is the lecture intended?
A.Freshman.
B.Sophomore.
C.Junior.
D.Senior.
第10題
聽力原文: Welcome to physiology 100. I'm doctor Ann Roberts. l think everyone here is the sophomore since this is the nursing department's second year physiology course. If you are first year nursing students, please see me after class about transfering to the introductory course. OK, I'd like to begin my first lecture by introducing two important terms: vitalism versus mechanism. How many of you've heard these terms? Oh, I see someone of you has! Well, vitalism and mechanism are two completely opposed approaches to human physiology. According to the vitalist, the laws of the physics and chemistry alone cannot explain the processes of life. To the vitalist, there is a so- called "vital force" and this "vital force" is totally separated from mental energy. As you may have guessed, vitalism is a kind of philosophical approach. Mechanism, on the other hand, is the view that all life phenomena, no matter how complex, can be explained according to chemical and physical laws, since we can support mechanism through scientific experimentations. The modem scientist tends to be a mechanist, but vitalism is not totally dismissed especially in feel, such as brain physiology. There are terms, such as human consciousness, that haven't been defined by physical and chemical terms. I recently read an interesting article that deals with the variant question that whether the mind is separated from the brain or whether the chemical is in the physiological working of the brain. I'd like to continue with this next time and so we can speak more details. I have some copies of that article and I want you to take them home and read them for next week.
What does Tom threaten to do if he can't get what he wants?
A.To shout out in front of the others.
B.Not to leave the boss's office.
C.To accuse the company.
D.To quit his job.
第11題
In an article on the new manners, Ms. Holmes says that a perfectly able woman no longer has to act helplessly in public as if she were a model. For example, she doesn't need help getting in and out of cars. She also says there is no reason why a man should walk on the outside of a woman on the sidewalk.
As far as manners are concerned, I suppose I have always been a supporter of women's liberation. Over the years, out of a sense of respect, I imagine, I have refused to trouble women with outdated courtesies.
It is usually easier to follow rules of social behaviour than to depend on one's own taste. But rules may be safely broken, of course, by those of us with the gift of natural grace. For example, when a man and woman are led to their table in a restaurant and the waiter pulls out a chair, the woman is expected to sit in the chair. That is according to Ms. Ann Clark. I have always done it the other way, according to my wife.
It came up only the other night. I followed the hostess to the table, and when she pulled the chair out I sat on it, quite naturally, since it happened to be the chair I wanted to sit in.
"Well, "my wife said, when the hostess had gone, "you did it again."
"Did what?" I asked, utterly confused.
"Took the chair."
Actually, since I'd walked. through the restaurant ahead of my wife, it would have been awkward, I should think, not to have taken the chair. I had got there first, after all.
Also, it has always been my custom to get in a car first, and let the woman get in by herself. This is a courtesy I insist on as the stronger sex, out of love and respect. In times like these, there might be attackers hidden about. It would be unsuitable to put a woman in a car then shut the door on her, leaving her at the mercy of some bad fellow who might be hiding in the back seat.
It can be concluded from the passage that______.
A.men should walk on the inside of a sidewalk
B.women are becoming more capable than before
C.in women's liberation men are also liberated
D.it's safe to break rules of social behaviour